Global Inspirational AWARD WINNER in Global Business Summit 2024

GMP Compliance
  • May 23, 2025

GMP Compliance Challenges to the Pharma Industry – 2025

Over the past decade, the pharmaceutical industry has experienced significant changes in the regulatory landscape, presenting more challenges to pharmaceutical companies than earlier. In addition to stricter regulatory guidelines, agencies such as the FDA, EMA, MHRA, and many more have intensified their enforcement of Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) standards, introducing more rigorous expectations and frequent inspections. This global tightening of compliance requirements is reshaping how pharmaceutical companies operate, necessitating the adoption of advanced systems and robust quality cultures to remain inspection-ready and compliant. While this ensures patients worldwide have access to high-quality medicines, it also presents numerous challenges for pharmaceutical companies, some of which include:

Existing Regulatory Complexity

One of the primary difficulties in GMP compliance is navigating the various regulatory requirements. Different countries and regions have distinct GMP standards, and pharmaceutical companies operating globally must adhere to these diverse regulations. For example:

  • In the United States, the FDA establishes GMP guidelines; their inspections are often stricter compared to other areas.
  • The European Union has its own GMP standards under EudraLex, Volume 4, and conducts thorough inspections.
  • Countries in Asia, such as India and China, have regulations that differ significantly from those in Western regions.

This variation requires specialized teams and resources to ensure compliance across multiple jurisdictions. Incorrect interpretation and implementation of these standards can result in penalties, product recalls, or bans.

The Rise in Regulatory Scrutiny

In recent years, regulatory agencies have adopted more stringent oversight measures, primarily driven by malpractices identified during inspections of various pharmaceutical companies globally. Unannounced inspections are becoming common, often catching manufacturers unprepared. A recent publication by the USFDA has also clarified their intent to increase the frequency of unannounced inspections.

Key focus areas include:
Supply Chain & Third-Party Oversight: With the increasing reliance on outsourcing, regulators are holding companies accountable for vendor compliance. It is no longer acceptable to outsource activities and shift responsibility for non-conformities to external companies. The number of Form 483 observations issued by the USFDA has increased, with contract givers also being held responsible due to inadequate qualification and management of contractors.

Always Be Inspection Ready: Companies must always be inspection-ready, adhering to systems that demonstrate full compliance at any given time. Dual standards—one for routine work and another for announced inspections will no longer work.

Evolving Guidelines: Alongside stricter scrutiny, companies face challenges from routine updates to guidelines. Understanding these updates and implementing them within the assigned timeframe is crucial. Updates to Annex 1 (sterile manufacturing), ICH Q9 (R1) (quality risk management), various impurity profiles, and FDA guidance on quality metrics reflect a shift toward risk-based approaches. Compliance can quickly turn to non-compliance (without any wrong doing) if guideline updates are not continuously monitored and implemented correctly.

Data Integrity & Computerized Systems: Issues related to data breaches, data integrity, or inadequate control over computerized systems have been cited in almost one-third of inspections conducted by authorities, a significant increase compared to a decade ago. Regulators demand robust electronic record-keeping and audit trails to prevent data manipulation. Data integrity is specifically evaluated through various means by the inspectors.

Quality Culture: A proactive, organization-wide commitment to quality is now a critical expectation. Due to higher market competition, companies prioritize product launch timings, sometimes resulting in non-compliant approaches where senior management emphasizes product launch over quality.

These changes compel companies to reassess their compliance strategies, often under tight deadlines and resource constraints.

Human Factors

Despite advancements in technology, human involvement in pharmaceutical manufacturing has increased due to expertise demand for innovation. Human errors pose risks to GMP compliance, including:

  • Adequate training and education for all personnel levels.
  • Reducing mistakes in manual processes like weighing and mixing ingredients.
  • Promoting a culture of compliance and awareness.

Recruiting and retaining professionals knowledgeable in GMP is challenging, especially in rapidly growing regions. Human error and untrained personnel are major causes of non-conformities cited by authorities during inspections.

Cost Constraints

Implementing GMP standards demands significant financial investment in infrastructure, training, audits, and certifications. Outsourcing production activities and quality support has become costly. Smaller to medium pharmaceutical companies, especially in developing countries, may struggle with these expenses. Even larger firms must balance compliance costs with profitability amid competitive pricing.

Environmental and Sustainability Concerns

Pharmaceutical manufacturing involves chemicals and processes that affect the environment. Ensuring GMP compliance while adhering to environmental regulations adds complexity. Companies must:

  • Invest in environmentally friendly manufacturing techniques.
  • Handle waste disposal in accordance with both GMP and environmental laws.
  • Minimize energy consumption and reduce carbon footprint.

Balancing sustainability with compliance is an increasing focus for the industry.

How PHARMALANE UK Supports Clients in Overcoming These Challenges

PHARMALANE UK, a global Quality auditing consultancy, assists pharmaceutical companies in overcoming compliance challenges with tailored solutions:

GxP Audits & Mock Inspections: These audits simulate regulatory inspections to identify and address gaps before they result in findings. The recommendations provided by consultants during these inspections are based on risk assessments (rather than blindly overdoing the things) and globally accepted practices.

Third-Party and Supply Chain Oversight: PHARMALANE UK helps clients create supplier qualification programs, monitoring protocols, and documentation systems for full compliance. Supplier quality auditing by us provides stricter control over outsourced activities such as production, testing, packing, storage, and raw materials. This ensures a significant portion of compliance requirements is met.

Audit Readiness Programs: Support for keeping documentation, personnel, and systems inspection-ready.

Training & Capability Building: Workshops to train teams on current regulations and best practices. Specialized training workshops with real-life examples and case studies are provided to prevent GMP non-compliance.

In conclusion, PHARMALANE UK provides comprehensive support to address most of above GMP compliance challenges effectively, if not all. Our experienced consultants and administrative staff are prepared to assist your systems in reducing errors, overcoming human factors, and managing cost constraints by providing various quality auditing services. Our services are offered at competitive rates, making them accessible to small and medium-sized companies as well.

We invite you to collaborate with us so that your company can mitigate numerous challenges by leveraging the expertise of PHARMALANE UK, one of the most esteemed Quality Auditing Consultancies in the world.

 

 

 

    Leave Us Message

    Audit Report Package

    Our Audit Report Package is very thorough and includes all of the following which is sufficient enough to qualify the supplier:

    • Full Audit Report.
    • Auditor’s CV.
    • Auditor’s non-conflict of interest declaration.
    • CAPA plan with evidence, as applicable.
    • Audit closure signed by Lead Auditor, with CAPA review confirmation.
    • Attachments including lists, certificates, licenses, layout etc.
    • Additional documents such as SMF, SOP index, Site presentation etc. as available.